Analysis of Human rights Act 1998 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

compend of Human pays action 1998 - Essay ExampleTo abide the above express aims and to appease the people who ar hankering for unity and unanimity, the Act incorporates some purvey which extends some rights to the people to jollify these unity .These provisions give the so called conventional rights to the people from the all area includes offenders, suspects etc. But the question is how outlying(prenominal) these rights enjoyable to these offenders particularly for suspects whose status is neither in the culprits nor in the normal individuals. The question is whether their rights are be protected aptly or not is a crucial question before the Law.As said above the suspects also enjoy the benefits of the different provisions which meant for the well being of the society. Article 2 of the Act provides everyone present in UK has the right of life and no one can de be deprived of their life, includingthose much(prenominal) as suspected terrorists or violent criminals. Moreove r Article 3 gives the suspects a right to liberty from torturing, inhumane or degrade treatment. It further says that even in times of war or early(a) public emergency, a person has the right not to be treated in these ways .It is a also applicable to the suspects.By sticking to the individual fre... As said above the suspects also enjoy the benefits of the different provisions which meant for the well being of the society. Article 2 of the Act provides everyone present in UK has the right of life and no one can de be deprived of their life, including those such as suspected terrorists or violent criminals. Moreover Article 3 gives the suspects a right to freedom from torturing, inhumane or degrading treatment. It further says that even in times of war or other public emergency, a person has the right not to be treated in these ways .It is a also applicable to the suspects. By sticking to the individual freedom of living own life ,the Act empowers the persons to live in individu alized privacy taking into the account of rights and freedom of the others and also limits on the extent to which a public allowance can do thing which invade your privacy about your body without your permission. The point is well explained in Law Vs R (2) and it was held that the principal purpose of s 8 of the charter was to protect an accuseds privacy interests against ridiculous intrusion by the state. In the instant case, the mere fact that the police recovered the stolen property was lacking(p) to support an inference that the owners voluntarily relinquished their expectation of privacy in the item and the Court sustain that the officers conduct constituted an unreasonable search. It followed that there was a violation of s 8 of the charter. Moreover referring the dominion 21 of the Body of the principles on detention, which envisages the well being of the suspects who is in detention by prohibiting undue service