'Counseling Ethics Essay\r'

' righteouss be based on philosophical principles and these guidelines swear out a practiti championr in reservation the vanquish possible decisions for the welfargon of the customers and the practician himself. Ethics are normative or unfavorable in temper and concern human administer and moral decision. worship describes decision making and judgement by an exclusive concerning an incident or human behaviour. This is greatly formd by the values he or she has acquired or make as a result of external influence or indoctrination. Value is an enduring belief that a specific that a specific end-state of conduct is wanted (McLeod, 1998). Terminal and instrumental values are twain types of values where the former refer to the desired end-state of existence, for employment wisdom and the later refer to the mode of conduct that leads to it, for example broad-mindedness .Values then influence and determine the decisions we make out to make in our daily lives.\r\nIn providin g an effective, redress therapy, a practiti oner divine serviceing a node encountering plight in decision- making may survey the eight †beat poseur approach to stand for done the estimable conundrums (Corey, Corey & C every last(predicate)anan, 2007). The steps of the pose are described as follows:\r\n gait 1- nominate the paradox or dilemma.\r\nIn the first step the existence of the problem moldiness be recognised. The character of the problem has to be run intoed. Identify if it is an honorable, legal, moral, professional or clinical problem. The practitioner’s and the node’s insights regarding the problem moldiness be examined. Consultation with the guest git begin at this stage as problems are organism identified. Looking at the problem from polar perspectives is useful as most ethical dilemmas are complex.\r\nStep 2 †Identify the potential drop issues mired.\r\nFrom the collected information, ir germane(predicate) ones moldines s be discarded. The diminutive issues must be noned and described. The welfare of those problematic; their rights and responsibilities must be evaluated. Ethical principles relevant to the problem must be identified and examined with the knob. In doing so the moral principles namely, autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, justness and fidelity must be considered and applied to the situation. The safety and welfare of the lymph gland and practitioner backnot be compromised while potential issues are being sorted out.\r\nStep 3- Review the relevant moral philosophy codes.\r\nThe practitioner must seek guidance that can be found from the professional codes of ethical motive. They provide a basis for accountability, and through their enforcement, provide protection for leaf nodes from unethical practices (Corey, 1997). Practitioner must also examine the amenity of his values with the relevant codes. Should they be in conflict, he must provoke a rationale to curb his stance. It is essential to consider congruency of these values and ethics with those of the thickening’s. The practitioner must ensure clarity of the ethical codes and if they are applicable with the state laws of the region.\r\nStep 4- populate the applicable laws and regulations.\r\nThe practitioner should be up to realise with the specific and relevant laws that withstand to the ethical issue. This is oddly critical in situations which deal with keeping or breaching of confidentiality, reporting of child or elder plague, take down keeping, assessment, diagnosis, issues pertaining to dangers to self or others and the grounds of malpractice.\r\nStep 5- sop up stopover of reference.\r\nConsulting with colleagues to obtain contrasting perspectives on the problems is gener every last(predicate)y considered to be helpful. Seeking legal counsel for legal questions is circumspect along with consulting a person with an expertise in an unfamiliar culture to serve a guest from t hat culture. In addition the practitioner must sympathize current rules and regulations of the agency or organization that he or she is working for. It is wise for the nature of the consultation and suggestions provided to be documented. These records would illustrate the practitioner’s assay to adhere to the community’s standard practice.\r\nStep 6- Consider possible and presumable courses of challenge.\r\nAt this point a list of a variety of courses of meet may be identified through brainstorming. The practitioner could deal with the guest as well as other professionals the available options. The possibilities could be identified for verisimilar courses of actions and these should be documented.\r\nStep 7- Enumerate the consequences of discordant decisions.\r\nFrom the various possible courses of actions, implications of each course must be examined. The questions of who willing be changeed and to what extent will the client’s decision to pursue the actions incite them must be carefully examined. Again victimisation the fundamental moral principles as a framework, the client must collaborate with the practitioner to ascertain the probable outcomes and consequences. If new ethical issues arise from the selected course of action, a re-evaluation of the action must be pursued.\r\nStep 8- find on what appears to be the best course of action.\r\n diligent consideration of all information received from different sources deliberately and with sensitivity to cross cultural issues is critical before making the best decision. Once making the decision, informing the supervisor, implementing and documenting the decision follows. Reflecting on the experience considering all follow up action could result in finding a solution for the client.\r\nWhile the adjective steps may help in closure ethical matters, some implications may be noted. Firstly, the client enters a collaborative affinity with the practitioner. The implication is that the client with the practitioner’s help must draw out the details of the problem. This implicates that the client should refrain from coveting relevant information to enable an accurate analysis of the issue. This is to ascertain the true nature of the problem whether it is an ethical, legal, moral, professional, or clinical one. The different perspectives of the problem must be hangd. What are the insights the client and practitioner have regarding the problem? (Corey et al., 2007). flunk which the consequence is an unnecessary delay in decide the problem as at that place will be an inaccurate analysis of the situation.\r\nSecondly, in identifying the potential issues, all the persons involved in the problem must be identified. The implication of failing to identify any one individual who may be affected by the decision of the client would be unethical. The welfare, rights and responsibilities of those affected by the decision might create a different set of problems. T he decision would then have to be reversed and a new course of action would have to be pursued. It is to therefore necessary to explore to what extent the course of the action will affect the client and the others (Corey et al., 2007).\r\nNext the values and ethics of the client and the practitioner must be evaluated and the degree of congruency noted. This implicates that the relevant ethical principles that are identified to the problem should not be in conflict with those of the client and the practitioner. If there are disagreements, then they must be back up with a rationale. If necessary, guidance must be want from the relevant organization to clarify the professional codes to the contingent problem. Otherwise consequently, the client’s decision may violate the ethical codes relevant to the issue.\r\nThe client must be informed of the relevant and most youthful laws or regulations that apply to the situation. He must look out for any law or regulations that have a b earing on the situation. The implication of his ignorance is that he may run into problems with the law. The practitioner too must abide by the rules, regulations and policies of the workplace. When in doubt practitioner must seek professional advice. The client must be informed of legal issues related to confidentiality, abuse of the vulnerable, record keeping and grounds for malpractice. If the practitioner discovers a criminal act by a client for example, sex with an under-aged girl he has the moral indebtedness to report him. The practitioner has the ethical responsibility to discuss with the client on the implications of his actions before reporting the incident. The client must understand the implications of his actions that violate the law.\r\nThe fundamental moral principles may be considered as framework for evaluating the consequences of the attached course of action. The client must decide the principles that apply to the situation specifically and prioritise them. By idea through these ethical principles, professional can get out evaluate their options in such complex situations. Prioritising the principles can help the client and practitioner to work through the steps of the decision-making manikin (Elizabeth, 2010). There are implications but when prioritizing one over another. The practitioner encourages the client to feat autonomy i.e. making a free choice. In doing so, the client must have the concept of doing no harm or non-maleficence and acting in justice (Elizabeth, 2010). Conflict can arise when subscribing to justice which may result in the necessity of treating an individual differently. though not easy to apply equal pondertage to all the principles, it will help to explore an ethical dilemma and resolve it with the least damage to the welfare of those affected.\r\nThe model may be useful when clients seek help in making decisions in their life regarding relationship issues. A client may be caught in a loveless spousal and be involved in an extra-marital affair and seek advice to take the near step in his life. The dilemma of whether to dissolve his marriage and move on with his life or stick to in the marriage to fulfil his duties towards his wife and children is one that needs careful consideration. A divorce would pixilated breaking up of his family and causing a good luck in the relationship with his children. Staying in the marriage would close the sacrifice of his love life. Analysing his situation using the model can shed light to clarify the implications of his actions and weigh the consequences.\r\nThe model may help clients to make decisions at their place of work regarding conflicting work practices. An dapple worker may be tormented by the wrong practices of her fellow colleagues. She may be lining a dilemma as to whether to report her colleagues to the circumspection or turn a blind centre of attention to the situation. The model can help the client to go bad the situation and eval uate her moral values. She would then be able to make an ethical decision that would do least harm to those involved in the situation.\r\nIn conclusion, the eight †step model can be a useful tool in dowry a practitioner to guide clients to make unplumbed decisions that do not have conflict with their ethics and are aligned with the laws and regulations of the region. In doing so the practitioner must ensure that he or she is operational in the best interest of the clients.\r\n'