Summarizing Your Reactions To The Article

Most ominous portents of the proximo of humanness and the earth normally discounts human beings from being part of it leaving the earth peradventure dramatically torn or barren , polluted , wreaked havoc upon , and in all probability , either already dead or dying . Of course there s the optimistic and fiddling than cynical view of the coming(prenominal) , one which still discounts military man or humanity from it , alone which appends the example of machines and technology in place of our biological and organic selvesThe latter view of the future tense doesn t come as the least bit surprising technology and machines are becoming an increasingly significant aspect of our the vulgar mawkish intelligence is already a reality , and with the cognitive content afforded by machines devoid of the weakness of human bag gage and inconsistencies , it s alone a calculate of time before we re effectively replaced . harp Microsystems question scientist Billy Joy notwithstanding affirms this sentiment and political theory in an April 2000 hold en rubricd , Why The Future Doesn t need UsIn the give tongue to article , fittingly published in cable Magazine , Joy writes what the rest of us finds unsettling , but which has theless been foreshadowed to a greater extent than a few times in contemporary films , books boob tube shows , and similar commentaries regarding the subject matter of humans inevitably and effectively being replaced or at the very least surpassed by the machines and technologies which they createdHe relates , rather specifically , how the instance of nanotechnology genetic engineering , robotics , and or so the entire earthly concern of new technologies in the wake of the 21st light fixture are threatening to make humans an exist species (Joy , 2000 .

The enclose of the article is familiar to the readers , but the writer and chief scientist theless delves into the said subject matter , with a detailed disceptation evincing not just a seeming ominous prediction of the future of the human race , but an honest defense , or perhaps , warning or disclaimer as to wherefore he believes this is so . Joy makes reference to non-homogeneous individuals with significant relevancy to the said subject matter such(prenominal) as Ray Kurzweil , Danny Hillis , Moravec , and so on citing similar arguments from antithetic individuals , and relating circumstances and turn of even outts which further reinforce the premise of his a rticle , and perhaps ultimately responding to the title , Why The Future Doesn t admit UsWith the number of possibilites which astonish on to be given birth , and which inevitably and inevitably terpsichore at the turn of every century with new technologies , robotics , artificial intelligence , and the menacing future which comes of course and associated with them and with the rest of the manhood being ultimately and fundamentally unchanging , the best humanity and human beings can do is to snappy in the hand over , in the here and nowIt may appear naive , or seem like an utter cliche , and may even comp allowely miss the point , - which , let us hope it doesn t - but the article implicitly addresses and reminds us how precious the present is and how we should , in turn , try...If you want to get a full essay, install it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write m! y paper